The Failure of No Fault Auto InsuranceThe insurance industry bitterly opposes pro-consumer reforms that would force insurers to justify their rates, limit excessive profiteering and waste and create a more competitive marketplace. To counter campaigns seeking such reforms, insurance companies have promoted "no fault" auto insurance. No fault mandates limits on claims by and compensation to auto accident victims, in effect limiting public access to the courts. The industry's no fault approach focuses on reducing policy benefits for victims while at the same time expanding coverage to include those who cause auto accidents. Despite the limitations on consumer rights, no-fault systems have consistently produced higher premiums for drivers than states using an insurance system based on personal responsibility, rather than one that assigns no fault. FTCR's 2005 No Fault Premium Study More Information History of the No Fault Concept A Failed Experiment: Analysis and Evaluation of No Fault Laws An Analysis and Critique of the RAND Corporation's Studies in Support of No Fault Laws "Choice" No-Fault and Other Recent Proposal Proposition 200 |