Patients injured by an incompetent doctor, negligent hospital or a provider’s error deserve the right to justice and their day in court. The right to trial by jury is, after all, the 7th Amendment to the Constitution. But politicians, the insurance industry, and the medical lobby want to take that right away.

Sign the petition to fight medical negligence in California.

Get the Facts on Malpractice Caps and Insurance Reform
Doctors want to limit patients' legal rights in response to high insurance premiums, but hurting patients doesn't solve the problem. Read FTCR's groundbreaking report How Insurance Reform Lowered Doctor's Medical Malpractice Rates In California...And How Malpractice Caps Failed.

California Prop 103 Saves Doctors Millions
In the early 1990s California insurers refunded approximately $100 million to doctors to comply with Proposition 103 and, recently, FTCR has used Prop 103 to save doctors and nurses more than $60 million.

Smoking Guns: Insurance Industry Documents
The nation's largest medical malpractice insurers publicly claim that damage caps are needed to stop skyrocketing claims and lower doctors' premiums, but these insurer smoking guns, as well as reports by industry agencies and academic studies, prove that insurer allegations are phony and caps don’t work.

How Malpractice Caps Really Work

Steven Olsen

Twelve-year-old San Diego resident Steven Olsen is blind and brain damaged because, as a jury ruled, he was a victim of medical negligence when he was two years old. He fell on a stick in the woods while hiking. Under the family's managed care plan, the hospital pumped Steven up with steroids and sent him away with a growing brain abscess, although his parents had asked for a CAT scan because they knew Steven was not well. The next day, Steven Olsen came back to the hospital comatose. At trial, medical experts testified that had he received the $800 CAT scan, which would have detected a growing brain mass, he would have his sight and be perfectly healthy today.

The jury awarded $7.1 million in "non-economic" damages for Steven's avoidable life of darkness and suffering. However, the jury was not told of the two decade old restriction on non-economic damages in the state - California's Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act. The judge was forced to reduce the amount to $250,000. The jurors only found out that their verdict had been reduced by reading about it in the newspaper...(more)

Read more medical malpractice stories.

©2000-2008 Consumer Watchdog. All Rights Reserved. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy